Federal drug laws produce a labeling issue. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you might think of Pablo Escobar or Walter White, however the reality is that under federal law, drug traffickers include individuals who buy pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealer; function as middleman in a series of little deals; and even pick up a travel suitcase for the wrong friend. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everybody on the totem pole can be subject to the very same serious mandatory minimum sentences.
To the men and females who drafted our federal drug laws in 1986, this might come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the factor to attach 5- and ten-year necessary sentences to drug trafficking was to punish "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are actually running these operations", and the mid-level dealers.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, almost everybody convicted of a federal drug criminal activity is convicted of "drug trafficking", which more often than not leads to at least a 5- or ten-year necessary prison sentence. That's a great deal of time in federal prison for many individuals who are minor parts of drug trade, the large majority of whom are males and females of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett sits on the district court in northern Iowa, and he manages a great deal of drug cases. "Never might I have envisioned," he writes in a recent piece in The Country, "that ... after nineteen years [as a federal district court judge], I would have sent 1,092 of my fellow citizens to federal prison for necessary minimum sentences ranging from sixty months to life without the possibility of release. Most of these women, males and young adults are nonviolent drug addicts." What about the kingpins? "I can count them on one hand," he states.
The numbers can't convey the absurd disaster of it all. This is how he explains a recent drug trafficking case:
I recently sentenced a group of more than twenty offenders on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. Eighteen were 'pill smurfers,' as federal district attorneys put it, implying their function amounted to routinely purchasing and delivering cold medication to meth cookers in exchange for extremely small, low-grade amounts to feed their severe dependencies. All of them dealt with mandatory minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
They found that in 2005, the www.criminallawyerslasvegas.com/drug-conspiracy-defense-las-vegas bulk of the lowest-level drug- and crack-trafficking defendants-- men and ladies explained as "street-level dealerships", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- received five- or ten-year necessary jail sentences. This is specifically true for crack-cocaine accused, many of whom are black; regardless of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, offering a small quantity of fracture drug (28 grams) brings the same obligatory minimum sentence-- 5 years-- as offering 500 grams of powder drug.
This is the reality for which proponents of serious federal drug laws should account. We need to admit that our sentencing of small players in the drug trade to prison terms implied for the leaders of big drug organizations-- as a common incident, not as an exception.
If lengthy mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug addicts actually worked, one might be able to justify them. I have actually seen how they leave hundreds of thousands of young kids parent less and thousands of aging, infirm and passing away moms and dads childless.
Here, once again, we have evidence that Judge Bennett is right: long mandatory sentences are unnecessary for many drug wrongdoers. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and New York City repealed mandatory sentences for drug culprits and provided judges the power to impose much shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment. The sky didn't fall, however criminal offense rates did. Did jail expenses.
He has actually seen necessary laws composed for the most major, massive drug dealerships used to the guys and ladies on the most affordable rungs of the drug trade, and he has actually seen it occur a lot. We when thought of that serious necessary sentences would be utilized to deal with the leaders of big drug operations.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777